sell-pokerstars-w-dollarstrade-pokerstars-w-dollars
pokerstars-exchange-money pokerstars-exchange-chips pokerstars-exchange-dollars

SELL POKERSTARS W$ T$ DOLLARS INSTANTLY!

exchange-pokerstars-w-dollars buy-pokerstars-w-dollars

buy-pokerstars-money

sell-pokerstars-t-dollars
buy-pokerstars-t-dollars Good Luck
In All Your Events!

----------------
Sell PokerStars T$
(Current Rate: 98.2%)

----------------
Sell PokerStars W$
(Current Rate: 94.5%)

----------------
Latest Blog:
poker_in_pb, Nov 25
Fun Tuesday...

----------------
exchange-pokerstars-t-dollars
trade-pokerstars-t-dollars

sell-pokerstars-money
Strategies, Articles, and Tips


1. The Benefits of Luck Analyzers
Luck Analyzers read hands written to your hard drive and help determine what games/stakes/styles you should employ.

2. WPT Real-Time Results
This tool shows up-to-date results and allows searching and categorizing of data, courtesy of World Poker Tour


The Benefits of Luck Analyzers (top)
by Mark Vargas
Oct 1, 2009

It seems like all of the major topics have been covered here in the past year(s); SB vs BB, ROI, when to move up stakes, BR management, shoving/calling ranges, useful software, relevant sample sizes, etc. I thought I might be able to add a small contribution that combines a few of these and doesn't get mentioned much: Adjusted Results.

We all know that there is both luck and skill involved in SNGs. When determining what games to play, what stakes, what styles, etc. it is difficult to compare your results to each other. Usually the sample sizes are too small to make any interesting revelations, and by the time you do have a decent sample size, you might realize that you would've been better off playing a different game/stake/style. Therefore I think these types of calculations are important for a) new SNG players that want to know their true ROI without playing thousands of games and b) experienced SNG regs who need to know what games/styles to play in order maximize hourly rates.

The first thing to do is get a program to calculate your adjusted results. I wrote my own, but HEM now has one or for benchmark purposes Juk's is well tested and accepted. You can find it here. These programs take every preflop all-in situation and calculate the statistically expected EV against the actual results. I know that there are many other forms of "luck" besides just PF all-ins, but this is easily the largest single factor that is out of your control and its adjusted results give a very accurate prediction of your true ROI. Here is a chart of a bad "Actual" stretch from a single buy-in level:

sell-pokerstars-dollars-chart1

Note this chart is a 5,000 break-even chart (vertical axis is buy-ins). Using a luck analyzer shows that this player experienced a 200 buy-in unlucky stretch. Without a luck analyzer, surely these results would be enough to solidly determine that major playing adjustments need to be made, stakes need to be lowered, etc. In actuality, this player is playing reasonably well and may not need to make many adjustmets to his/her game. Now let's look at the full chart of this same data set:

sell-pokerstars-dollars-chart2

The first chart was simply a magnified chart of games ~10,000-15,000. This 20k game chart shows a relatively smooth "Adjusted" results line.

For me personally, I use it the most when I'm on huge losing streaks. Several times it showed that I had just been experiencing the ugly end of variance and I continued to play through it. The other times it showed that I was legitimately losing and I then made adjustments to my game (moved down stakes, fewer tables, and more studying).

***************************************

Want to know how much the games were affected post UIGEA? Want to know how much tougher the games are in Jan/Feb due to all the regs gunning for SNE? Want to know how much softer the games are during the WSOP since many regs aren't online? Want to know if you'd be better off 12-tabling the 18-mans or 10-tabling the 9-mans? How many people have tried to move up stakes, got crushed, and scurried back down? You may have very well had the skill level to stay there, but with a small sample you just don't know. Once you get familiar with your luck analyzer, you can get these answers with relatively small sample sizes.

In past years a decent player who played a lot had a good enough feel for the games to determine when to move up/down, when table selecting was required, and what games to play. In today's environment, THAT IS NOT THE CASE! Any serious reg in today's environment has to fine-tune every aspect of his/her game in order to eke out the extra advantages.

Table selecting and constant assessment of your play with a luck analyzer is mandatory. If you haven't been using these tools and have just been going by your educated guess as in past years, you will eventually get burned when the variance hits. Two players that I respect the most just experiencecd this. I believe Spacegravy would never have made his prop bet if he had been utilizing these tools. Boku87 most likely isn't maximizing his hourly rate because he's focusing on volume and not which games are profitable to cherry pick. And these are arguably 2 of the top 5 SNG players in the world! What does that mean for you?

Be smart, don't get a huge ego, and concentrate on playing YOUR optimum game, at YOUR optimum stakes, with YOUR optimum villains.


WPT Real-Time Results (top)
by Mark Vargas
Oct 25, 2009

I thought it would be interesting to see how good the "pros" do at the big buy-in events. The WPT website has a great stats page with every person who has ever played in one of their events. I wrote a program to search those statistics and categorize them into interesting results. Since sample sizes are the most relevant factor, I looked only at players that had played at least 20 events. Here are the results as of: Nov 11, 2009


Overall ROI:
Top 5 ROI:
Bottom 5 ROI:
Minimum # of TourneysROI# of PlayersNameROIEntriesNameROIEntries
At least 20 WPT Events82.9%331Carlos Mortensen931.4%51Juan Mortenson-100.0%28
At least 25 WPT Events89.5%234Eugene Katchalov893.2%27Stephen Crockett-100.0%24
At least 30 WPT Events94.4%179Martin de Knijff821.3%32Narendra Banwari-100.0%23
At least 40 WPT Events109.0%111Davidson Matthew808.6%22Vincent Napolitano-100.0%21
At least 50 WPT Events116.8%74Gus Hansen808.2%45Alexandra Vuong-97.5%24
20-24 WPT Events50.7%97
25-29 WPT Events60.6%55
30-39 WPT Events53.7%68
40-49 WPT Events87.0%37

ROI stands for "Return On Investment", which is a common term for poker players. This means that if it is a $10,000 buy-in event and your ROI is 50%, you make $5,000 (which means you won $15,000 in the event, but after the buy-in you netted $5,000).

This data shows us that the top 331 players have an ROI of 82.9%, which is to say that they win, on average, $8290. That is definitely great money, but after you factor in travel expenses it gets cut down a fair amount. Like Daniel Negreanu mentioned in his blog, you've got to be good at satellites and most likely have to make money at some other form of poker to be on this tour full-time!

Variance is an ugly monster indeed. A few poor souls have actually goose egged their entire WPT careers. Juan Mortenson has not cashed in any of his 28 events. That's roughly $280,000 he's down. That's not a large number for a Negreanu or Ivey, but for a regular "pro", that's a tough pill to swallow.

If you want me to add more stats or interesting tables, feel free to mention it at our Contact Us page.














trade-pokerstars-moneyCopyright ©2007 - 2009exchange-pokerstars-money